Back to your test review

In an experiment, a leaf was kept in light with its stalk in water, but inside a closed jar with a dish of KOH. Another identical leaf was kept in a similar jar without KOH. After testing with iodine, the difference observed is best explained by the

  • (a) absence of CO2 in the first jar Correct
  • (b) presence of excess O2 in the second jar Your answer
  • (c) absence of light in the first jar Your answer
  • (d) absence of water in the first jar Your answer
Your answer: Correct answer: (a)
Advertisement

Explanation

Why (a) is correct

KOH absorbs CO2. The leaf in the KOH jar had no CO2, so it made no starch, while the other leaf did.

Why the other options are wrong

  • (b) · your answer Excess O2 was not the variable.
  • (c) · your answer Both jars were in light.
  • (d) · your answer Both leaves had water through their stalks.
NCERT point: This experiment shows that CO2 is needed for photosynthesis.
What is wrong?
Thank you! We will check this question.
Practise Photosynthesis in Higher Plants
Take a free 15-question NEET Biology test on this chapter. Timed, scored instantly.
Start free test

Similar questions

A student keeps an aquatic plant in water in bright light and counts the bubbles released. Which change would most reduc… Which of the following best explains why photosynthesis is called an oxidation-reduction process? The action spectrum of photosynthesis does not exactly follow the absorption spectrum of chlorophyll a, because